That one that teaches, learns. The giver becomes who receives. That one that cure will be cured. Abraham Maslow follows long-standing procedures to achieve this success. The wounded custodian is enabled to cure. But that one that it imprisons, becomes prisoner. Inside of a book, the word, in the word, the truths of each reader.

The dreams are the truths beyond me. Source: Nancy-Ann_DeParle. When I am imprisoned to my proper image (SHADE), I get loose myself of it unfastens what me. The release happens when my attention is not in me, it is not in my image. This image is the mask that requests the satisfaction to me of the other. To this it fixes me image in the mirror, that is the lake of Narcissus. the proper lake never arrives to know Narcissus, therefore proper it also is imprisoned, being imprisoner. Thus Wilde Oscar counts, who the lake cried when Narcissus died: ' ' I cry for it because, all the times that it lay down itself on my edges, I could see, in the deep one of its eyes, my proper beauty refletida' ' (Pablo Rabbit, the lake and Narcissus. In: Magazine GAC, Periodical the Gazette? 19I12I2010).

When I imprison my look in me, I see what I think that the other sees. I to the other imprison the other me and same. Thus, Narcissus and the lake, only becomes one, each one absorbing the other, thinking to be proper itself. I am reflecting on in the distance, the lack, the pregnant emptiness, the homesickness. All these words report to one alone thing: what there it is not searched, because it lacks. the search finda with the joy of the meeting. The meeting is to perpassar, not a permanence. Therefore the search is infinda. Therefore the joy is not permanent. It inhabits in perpassar, then it is necessary to search more and of new infinitely and. The natural consequence of the search is the meeting (who search finds, always in the last place or time).

When defense becomes aggressive – Living on the defensive many times leads us to react as aggressively as do those persons who supposedly defend ourselves. And it is possible that by doing so, we feel justified, either because the other started the argument, or offend us because we are so used to attack us and try to blame us for something we have not done so and simply react to automatic, without awareness of what we do or say to defend. – We should pause to reflect on our defensive behavior in an objective and realistic, to try to discover where it comes from and if with it we can really solve or – We should pause to reflect on our defensive behavior in an objective and realistic to try to discover where it comes from and if with it we can really solve or clarify the conflict we face, because repudiation aggravate our defensive reaction. – While we have an excuse to act like we do not change our behavior and, most serious, we avoid a recurrence. – We are all affected to a greater or lesser extent by some of the experiences we had in our childhood. If you grew up in a home where they seek to blame everything negative that happens, instead of offering solutions to these conflicts to not repeat and we could get something positive from that experience, "surely learned to defend ourselves, and say things like: "I was not," "I did not see" …

The author approaches thematic of the indiscriminate use of the Ritalina medicine in children and the adolescents who are diagnosised with DDA/H, from the stories of the family who brings as complaint behaviors of carelessness and inquietude inside of the classroom. It raises questioning on the real necessity of this legalized drug and on the used arguments, for the doctors, to base the upheaval of attention deficit and hiperatividade. For such, it makes analysis in the ways to learn human beings, the concept of attention and activity and of the values of the society of today. Society this, that sees the citizen as an only organic being, ignoring and denying singular individual only e; causing a generalized and impersonal treatment, what it finishes for resulting in preference, for the citizen, of the medication to attenuate pain psquicaa to dialogue on its you distress.

This reality is explained through seeming of its colleague Jorge Gonalves de a Cruz who makes historical analysis of the paper of the doctor justifying because the medicine sees the patient in such a way and what it is for backwards of the great growth of the pharmaceutical industry that, for times, it creates the remedy, later the illness. After that, in it discloses its analysis to them on DSM IV, concluding that it does not have reasonable justifications for diagnosis DDA/H. making a parallel with the requirement of the school on the maintenance of the attention of the pupil and supporting themselves in the conception of floating attention used by Freud, the author in intent for the focos multiples and the diverse situations that the pupil dirige its attention today. It considers, then, a reflection on the position of psicopedagogo, ahead of the attention and the hiperatividade, alerting to us for the question of the label in children diagnosised with DDA/H, that presents the symptoms as a form to point that they are not well for the family and the school, however does not possess such upheaval, thus being does not need the medicamentoso instrument.